Why we built SameScope.

The problem, told plainly

Homeowners describe a renovation in their own words, and every contractor who reads that description fills in the gaps with different assumptions. One assumes you want the cheapest fixtures; another assumes mid-range. One assumes the old tile gets hauled away; another assumes you’re handling that yourself. The bids that come back look like they’re for the same job. They usually aren’t.


That's not a minor inconvenience. It's the reason renovations go over budget, run long, and end in disputes nobody saw coming. Not because anyone was dishonest. Because nobody was ever actually comparing the same project in the first place.

Why this is harder than it sounds to fix yourself

A homeowner doesn't know which details matter to a contractor until it's too late, until the bid comes back wrong, or the work starts and the assumptions surface. Generic templates don’t really solve this: they assume you already know the construction vocabulary you were never going to have a reason to learn, so you end up translating your own project into a language you don’t speak, hoping you got it close enough.

What SameScope actually does

It turns your own words into the kind of structured, trade-specific scope of work a contractor is used to reading — without ever inventing a preference or detail you didn’t actually give it. If something’s genuinely unclear, it says so, plainly, in the document itself, instead of quietly guessing and letting you find out on-site.

What SameScope is not

  • Not a legal contract.

  • Not a replacement for a contractor’s site visit.

  • Not a lead-generation platform that profits from selling your information to contractors.

No contractor relationships, no referral fees, nobody’s leads being sold. The only thing being sold is the document itself, once, to you.

A note from the person who built it

SameScope was built by one person, not a company. The problem itself isn't a secret: homeowners describe a project in their own words, contractors fill the gaps with different assumptions, and the bids that come back aren't really for the same job. That's not a rare edge case, it's common enough that consumer protection agencies and industry researchers document it directly. This is meant to be the missing shared starting point, a way to say what you want clearly before that gap ever has a chance to open up.

Ready to see what yours would look like?